It was an absolute crazy 2016 NFL draft. The best and worst things about this profession were on full display. You had analyst’s mock drafts blowing up left and right as teams threw curveball pick after curveball pick. Some bottom feeder decided that they wanted to destroy a promising football player’s career over a stupid bong hit video. There were trades and subsequent fan bases rejoicing, or as a colleague stated, “Watched a fan spike his Kiko Alonso jersey in disgust!” But, there has been one thing bothering me this draft season (and yes it is a season) and it went from noticeable, to undeniable this past weekend.
There is a clear and unmistakeable double standard for white and minority quarterbacks.
Now I could write a small novel about every bias that exist, but instead I will simply point out some “interesting” tidbits associated with this draft.
#1: Is Jared Goff equal or better than Jameis Winston as a prospect?

Jared Goff was the #1 overall pick despite never leading his team to so much as a quality bowl game. He has never won a significant game, and in fact, one could argue that he has never performed like a star in a significant game. Yet, he is the guy to lead a franchise in a city where star power is the name of the game? When has he ever been a star?
#2: How is Carson Wentz better than Vernon Adams again?

So let me get this straight. Vernon Adams elevated a team to National Championship contention for three seasons. He was an FCS All-American multiple times. He made the move to one of the premiere programs in the nation and performed extremely well. But somehow, he is not better than a guy who couldn’t get on the field until his redshirt junior season. A guy who is so valuable that he lost two games out of the gate in his senior season, was hurt, and in his absence, the team returned to the national championship game without him. A guy who has never been a 1st team all-conference performer, and doesn’t have a forth of the playing experience of Adams, despite being the same age. The only thing I can definitively say that Wentz has an advantage over Adams is in his combine measurables.
#3: Why does Christian Hackenberg get a pass for two seasons of bad play after losing his coach, but Cardale Jones loses his coach and his diminished play is all his fault?

Hackenberg was the golden child coming out of high school; even though cracks in his game were exposed as far back as the Elite Eleven competition. He had a good (not great) freshman season at Penn State under then coach Bill O’Brien, who quickly bolted back to the NFL. Afterwards, Hackenberg didn’t improve, he regressed. The crazy thing is that we have heard more excuses made for his bad play than one can remember in recent history. In the end, he was just bad.
Cardale Jones still has not lost a game as a starter. He was brilliant during Ohio State’s National Championship playoff run. This past season, he lost his offensive coordinator Tom Herman and he didn’t play as well. However, unlike Hackenberg, who made two full seasons of terrible decisions at Penn State, critics have used every opportunity to take shots at Jones’ ability to operate an NFL offense.
#4: Two of the most dynamic and productive quarterbacks in college football last season can’t even get drafted?

Am I really supposed to believe that Trevone Boykin and Vernon Adams have not shown enough ability at the QB position to warrant a draft pick? I’ve watched several quarterbacks that I feel don’t deserve to be considered for employment in the NFL get drafted, while these two guys are left to fight it out in rookie minicamps just to get a training camp invite. For both Boykin and Adams, leadership, production, toughness and ability are not an issue. So why? One could argue that the three quarterbacks taken in the 1st round have just as many unknown variables.
#5: Are people already trying to devalue Deshaun Watson as the undeniable number one pick for next year?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but if Watson was in this draft, wouldn’t he have been the first overall pick? The reason that Goff and Wentz were elevated was due to Watson having to wait another season before declaring. But there’s no doubt that he was the most dynamic quarterback in college last season and he is only getting better. So to hear analysts begin to throw shade on his mechanics, performance – and my favorite – his decision-making ability; to hear them try and throw shade at his abilities as a leader or question his measurables is preposterous. Without a doubt there will be another white quarterback that will be thrusted into the first pick scenario when clearly the next legitimate white quarterback won’t be eligible for the draft until 2018.
I’ve tried over the years to steer clear of race and I defend the double standards that exist for white skill positions, but I have not come out and said anything related to black quarterbacks quite honestly for fear of being labeled an “angry black man” or “using the race card”, but the truth is the truth. I would be a hypocrite and ultimately not true to myself if I did not point out these things. So I no longer will. I will address them head on and let the chips fall where they may.
I welcome legitimate discussions from those who may believe my thoughts are misplaced. But I caution that any argument made that includes the ‘well I have a hidden agenda’ will be met with equal retort.
It’s a fascinating conversation and it’s time for us to have it in the open.
_______
Questions? Comments?
Tweet: @geneclemons
Email: gclemons@footballgameplan.com
*in my horrible rapper, but somehow very popular with everyone voice*
I AM NOT A WRITER
First of all, before I take you down this rabbit hole of draft possibility, I must say that there are a ton of terrible takes, analogies, comparisons, evaluations and rationale when it comes to the quarterback position and the NFL, and it’s coverage of the quarterback position.
Here are some of the aforementioned examples you hear blabbered about on the daily:
1. “It’s a quarterback driven league”
2. “If you don’t have a quarterback, you have to do what it takes to grab one”
3. “I would draft a quarterback every year”
4. “He has the look of a guy that you would want leading your franchise”
5. “He can set your team up for success for the next 10-15 years”
6. “Draft your franchise QB and let him sit and learn”
7. “The franchise quarterback is the only guy I would allow my wife to stray with because he’s the type of leader that I wouldn’t mind sharing one with.”
Ok, I made that last one up but you still get my point. The quarterback position, while extremely important, isn’t the magical elixir that can turn your 1-15 team into a Super Bowl champion overnight. It takes a TEAM to get you there, however, an elite QB is good for at least 8-9 wins alone. A good team around an elite QB is a perennial 11-13 win team (i.e. Tom Brady & the New England Patriots, Peyton Manning and his Indianapolis Colt squads..etc)
Lets debunk some of those QB Myths (gee, if only there was a book debunking many football myths in general www.footballgameplan.com/books ).
1. It’s not a “QB Driven League”, it’s a GOOD-to-GREAT QB driven league. Anthony Average isn’t leading your team to the playoffs. Tommy Turnover won’t pick-6 his way to a conference championship. You need a GOOD-to-GREAT QB in order to enjoy that level of success.
2. While I agree and appreciate the aggressiveness of this logic, theoretically you do get the chance ‘to do whatever it takes to get one’ each and every year in the NFL Draft. Imagine if you had your scouts travel throughout the country, gathering film and information on the best pro football talent across the 768 football-playing universities, I’m pretty sure you would’ve found a GOOD-to-GREAT “franchise” guy or “guy that can lead our team to-and-through the playoffs” fairly quickly. It’s not that hard to find GOOD-to-GREAT football players at that position.
4. Seriously? Are we talking football or modeling? I don’t care if my QB looks like this:

if he can hit the “Bang 8”, make the “Bucket Throw”, has good mobility, great situational awareness, and not afraid of pressure – both pressure from the opponent and pressure of the moment – I don’t give a damn what he “looks” like.
5. GOOD-to-GREAT QBs may hang around a team for that period of time. But again you have to remember, not every QB that’s drafted in the 1st Round is of that caliber. So, in all likelihood, he won’t touch a decade in the same spot.
6. This is one of my favorite, dumbest-things-that’s-said-about-quarterbacks that I like to talk about. Poet Laureate E.H. Jr. wrote about this very myth here ( www.footballgameplan.com/books ) in the critically acclaimed “Stiff-Arming Football Myths” book which is available in both paperback and PDF form. You can simply ask yourself this question “When have I personally gotten better at something, more efficient at something by not actually doing that something and sitting back watching someone else do that something?” (Also, you’ll find within that critically-acclaimed football literary masterpiece that E.H. Jr. talked about all those dumbass examples you’re probably rattling off in your head right now as you read this)
Now that I got that off my chest, let’s get back to the real reason why we all gathered here today.
Imagine if you will..
The Eagles are NOT taking a QB at #2. Now, before you Twinkie-fingered, mouth-breathers camp out in my twitter mentions ready to hate tweet “BuT AlEX SHEFFTA tWeetEd da EAGLES will taek a QWAdarBak”, hear me out.
1. What are the Eagles team needs?
A quick glance at their roster and you’ll see that they could use a (in order of importance) RB, OT, DE, S, WR, LB, QB. Now, ask yourself, who are the 4 ‘premier talents’ in this year’s draft class:
RB – Ezekiel Elliott, Ohio State
OT – Laremy Tunsil, Ole Miss
DE – Joey Bosa, Ohio State
S – Jalen Ramsey, Florida State
The Eagles were sitting at the #8 slot. With the Browns, Chargers, Cowboys, Jaguars, Ravens and 49ers picking ahead of them. When you look at those teams’ needs, who would you say really needs a QB? You can say maybe the Cowboys and 49ers. And I say maybe because the Cowboys also need a RB and DE in the worst way more so than “Tony Romo’s Heir-Apparent”. Would you pass on either Elliot or Bosa for one of these QBs? If you’re not drunk or on a sugar high, then probably not.
I also say maybe for the 49ers because who in the hell knows what they are thinking; but I do know one thing, Colin Kaepernick is still under contract, on the roster, and way better than the QBs being considered in the Top 10. He’s also led the 49ers to the Super Bowl and nearly another one before they (front office) decided that the coach that got them to nearly 2 Super Bowls services were no longer needed, and that it wasn’t in the team’s best interest to continue to stockpile offensive talent around their GOOD-to-GREAT QB.
So, it is conceivable to say that every last one of those teams would’ve been in contention for one of those four ‘premier talents’.
2. The Eagles have a lot of money invested in the QB position and adding a third would be financial idiocy.
Again, before you boiled hog knee-eatin’, Milwaukee’s Best-double fisting mouth-breathers hop in my mentions talking about the intricacies of the contract breakdown of Sam Bradford and Chase Daniel, I get it. Yes it may be ‘cap friendly’ BUT it is still too much money invested in a position where you can only play 1 guy at a time during a game. That’s not a good allocation of resources when you have a legit 4 holes that need to be filled.
3. The Browns know who the Eagles want to pick, which is someone that the Browns didn’t want but have an idea who (of the other 6 teams) did.
This is where the slight of hand comes into play. The Browns and/or Eagles may not know who the Rams plan to take number one. In my opinion, that’s irrelevant. For the Browns, in the AFC North, they would be more than willing to stick it to a division rival (Ravens) by trading out of that #2 spot with a team who wants the same player the Ravens may covet, but not the Browns. And, quite honestly, that’s not a QB. You’re possibly looking at Tunsil, Bosa, Elliott. That also sticks it to another conference member in the San Diego Chargers who could also be looking at either Tunsil, Ramsey or Bosa.
You see, the Browns are sitting pretty either way. Yes they ‘could’ use Ramsey, Elliott or Bosa, but when you glance at their roster, you see craters at Wide Receiver and a slight need at RB. However, judging how Hue Jackson utilized both Gio Bernard and Jeremy Hill, the thought is that he can get a good pair for Duke Johnson maybe in Round 2. (i.e. Derrick Henry)
4. Howie Roseman states that Sam Bradford is their starting QB for 2016.
This is true. And according to my Discovery ID training, probably the only absolute truth he states. Here’s the thing about Sam Bradford, he’s not a terrible QB. He’s not a bad QB. He’s an AVERAGE-to-GOOD. When healthy, he can be successful. He’s good for 6-7 wins alone WHEN HEALTHY. The fact that they signed him again, tells you all you need to know. You got to pay attention to the details.
5. Howie Roseman says that they will invest in quarterbacks.
Sorta true because they’ve already done that with the money they’ve given Sam Bradford and Chase Daniel. Also, they could still grab a QB in the 3rd Round (Pick 79 *cough* Dak Prescott *cough*) which would be technically invested in the position – this time at a cheaper cost. Taking a QB at #2 would cost the Eagles a little bit under $22 million dollars. That’s damn near, according to football math, 1 billion dollars tied up in one position where you can only play one player at a time.
6. It’s Draft Season aka ‘We Ain’t Telling You Sh*t’ Season
What Roseman Said: “We’re comfortable with whomever the Rams don’t take”
What the Media Thought He Said: “We’re taking Goff or Wentz”
Here’s where assuming gets you in trouble. Unless he flat out said “If the Rams take Goff, we’ll take Wentz and visa versa” then it’s still speculation. It doesn’t benefit the Eagles to state there intentions right now because, wait for it, they still have an opportunity to move down – but stay within the Top 7, recoup a 2nd or 3rd round pick, and still get their guy. It makes COMPLETE sense to hype up this #2 slot to a QB-thirsty team in the middle-to-latter part of the order. Good move Roseman.
It could potentially be a dumb move if all of the Eagles scouts advised and signed off on this move in agreement that these two QB options are worth these selections; and also if Roseman was advised that these two QB options aren’t worth the value of draft picks, nor the #2 selection and went Joe Kane on’em while eating a cheesesteak from Jimmy G’s and knocking back an ice cold Diet Tab and said ‘Fu*k it, I’m going with my gut’, then it’ll be a blunder of biblical proportions.
I fail to believe that based on the film study of these two QBs, or of any QBs in this draft class for that matter, are worth trading up for into the top 10 of Round 1, or selecting in Round 1 period.
When has someone, other than a team holding the #1 overall pick, has ever truthfully and honestly revealed their intentions?
7. Howie Roseman the NFL Draft Future QB Class Soothsayer
Roseman told the Rose Bowl of lies when he said that they took into account the next 3 draft classes and didn’t see a QB that was essentially better than these two QBs at the top of this draft.
Firstly
Secondly
2017 Quarterbacks
Joshua Dobbs, Tennessee
P.J. Walker, Temple
Brady Gustafson, Montana
Dakota Prukop, Oregon
Jared Johnson, UT-San Antonio
CJ Beathard, Iowa
2018 Quarterbacks
Deshaun Watson, Clemson
Brad Kaaya, Miami
Patrick Mahomes, Texas Tech
2019 Quarterbacks
Josh Rose, UCLA
DeShone Kizer, Notre Dame
Lamar Jackson, Louisville

So in conclusion, after a thorough investigation of the facts, I don’t think the Eagles plan on taking a QB at #2.
I’m probably 99% wrong on this, but hey…thanks for reading!
Questions? Comments?
Tweet: @FBallgameplan
Email: ehunt@footballgameplan.com